Currently, I want to use the planet scope data to understand the crop burning issues. I aim to use planet scope data for the following purpose:
- manually identify areas that burned
- use planet scope data as inputs for the machine leaning model combined with indices created using sentinel 2 bands.
I am curious about what is the main difference of this two data, and I know the ortho_analytic_8b_sr are normalised and can be harmonised using the harmonization tool (correct me if I am wrong). In this case, is this still necessary to purchase the analysis ready PS? what is the main advantage using this data?
Another question is when I place order to downland ortho_analytic_8b_sr scene, my area of interest is around 6, 000 square km, while the quota was used more than 15,000 square km. For the account I used (not this one), it shows the minimum charge per scene is 0.01 square km. why this result super high quota usage? Is there any better way to place the order that only be charged the area size of my interest. I understand that for each tile, there might be multiple scene for the same tile area. How can we optimise the quota usuage?
